The Hours with Meryl Streep: DVD Cover
  • Cover Image
  • Cover Image

The Hours Director: Stephen Daldry Cast: Meryl Streep, Julianne Moore, Nicole Kidman, Ed Harris

DVD - Wide Screen Learn more

BUY THIS ITEM

  • $9.99 Online price
    $8.99 Member price
  • skip to cart
  • Add To List uiAction=GetAllLists&page=List&pageType=list&ean=097363399049&productCode=DV&maxCount=100&threshold=3

GET FREE SHIPPING ON ORDERS OF $25 OR MORE

DELIVERY & GIFT DETAILS:

Usually ships within 24 hours

Delivery Time and Shipping Rates

Eligible for gift wrap & gift message.

Enter a zip code

  • DVD Release Date: 06/24/2003
  • Original Release: 2002
  • Rating: Rated PG13
  • Sales Rank: 17,417

Viewer Rating: (24 ratings)

Detailed Rating: "Performances" See All

More Formats 
DVD - Pan & Scan$9.99
VHS$12.99

Customers who bought this also bought

 
  • Overview
  • Editorial Reviews
  • Scenes
  • Customer Reviews
  • Cast & Crew
  • Full Product Details

Scenes

Features

Closed Caption; Commentary by Meryl Streep, Julianne Moore, and Nicole Kidman; Commentary by director Stephen Daldry and novelist Michael Cunningham; Filmmakers introduction; 4 featurettes: "Three Women," "The Mind and Times of Virginia Woolf," "The Music of the Hours," "The Lives of Mrs. Dalloway"; Theatrical trailer; Widescreen version enhanced for 16 x 9 TVs; Dolby Digital: English 5.0 Surround, English Dolby Surround, French; English subtitles

Full Product Details

Scene Index

Side #1 --
1. "The Certainty of Your Goodness"
2. The Hours
3. "I May Have a First Sentence"
4. "Happy Birthday!"
5. "Flowers!"
6. "I'm Staying Alive for You"
7. "This Day of All Days"
8. "To Show Him We Really Love Him"
9. "You're Reading a Book"
10. "Even Crazy People Like to Be Asked"
11. "It's Like Having a Presentiment"
12. "Did You Think I Was Better?"
13. "All I Want to Do Is Just Give a Party"
14. "Richmond or Death"
15. "An Idea of Our Happiness"
16. "I Chose Life"
17. "And Then to Put It Away"

Scene Index

Editorial Reviews

A complex, engrossing tale primarily enacted by three of the finest actresses working in film today, The Hours interweaves the stories of three profoundly unhappy women linked by an unforgettable book that reveals more about them than they care to admit. David Hare’s adaptation of Michael Cunningham’s Pulitzer Prize-winning novel is intricately structured and meticulously layered, and it creates an emotional vortex that’s as unforgettable as it is powerful. Nicole Kidman, deliberately de-glamorized, portrays novelist Virginia Woolf as a tortured soul whose brilliant work emerges out of her struggle with mental illness. Many years later, Woolf's novel Mrs. Dalloway has a hypnotic effect on Laura Brown (Julianne Moore), an emotionally barren housewife who cares little for her loving husband (John C. Reilly) and finds Cold War suburban life intolerable. Still later, Clarissa Vaughan (Meryl Streep), a middle-aged lesbian living in New York, conceals her private desperation while caring for her suicidal, AIDS-ravaged former lover (Ed Harris). Director Stephen Daldry (Billy Elliot) unobtrusively guides the three disparate story lines toward their inevitable conclusions, allowing his outstanding performers plenty of latitude in illustrating the different views of love, passion, and duty that comprise the movie’s core. There are no heroes or villains in this yarn, only people who -- like many of us -- silently yearn for something they fear they will never attain. Their longing is conveyed, palpably but with subtlety, in this richly emotional drama, a tour de force by virtue of its superb cast. Ed Hulse, Barnes & Noble

More reviews and recommendations

Customer Reviews

A great example of the form, but of reprehensible contentby camcgee97

Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings

February 09, 2009: The Hours contains many actors doing self-absorbed, thoughtless, and simply wrong things, but doing them well, and convincingly too. It excells in being one of the finest pieces of feminist tripe made for the screen.

What is revolting about the film is not so much the quality of its making, which was high, or the idea that living for other people with no regard for ourselves may make all parties miserable. That idea, when portrayed by such an all-star cast, could have been profound if it were subjected to more sophisticated treatment by Daldry, et. al. Instead, we get Moore and Kidman superbly portraying the now trite "unfulfilled, sexually repressed, woman role," which is made even more hackneyed by the fact that Moore's story takes place in the 50's. Moore would have done well to have added more life to her character, who came off as flat and selfish. Kidman (and the writer of the movie) could have benefitted from the reality that Woolf, when not under one of her "spells," was one of the great socialites of early 20th century England. Streep's character is the only one who shows any vitality, but there is something missing in her story as well.

No, simply questioning whether we are happy is not reprehensible. But this movie, in marginalizing men by making them little more than parasites, buffoons, or sidelights for women says nothing new or worthwhile. Instead, it seems to be saying that people, and women in particular, are oppressed by family life and by their obligations to other people. But in each case, the movie takes a far too simplistic look at these women's lives in order to make the above point.

Virginia Woolf's marriage seems to have been a very happy one, despite her apparent bipolarity. In fact, Woolf said, "after 25 years (I) can't bear to separate (from Leonard)... And our marriage so complete." The movie seems to be suggesting that the tragedy of her life was not her mental illness, but that she was somehow oppressed by having to live with Leonard and by not being able to realize her lesbianism. Of course, the film doesn't note that the Woolfs were members of the Bloomsbury Group, which discouraged exclusive sexual relationships. It was through the Bloomsbury Group that she met Vita Sackville-West, another married woman, with whom she had a lesbian relationship for most of the 1920's. But the evidence suggests that she loved her husband, was at most bisexual, and at least was simply ideoligically encouraged to have such relationships (and what was up with having Woolf kiss her own sister?).

DULL AND A COMPLETE WASTE!!!!!!!!!by Anonymous

Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings

June 20, 2008: While others reviewers have given this film 5 stars, I would have to disagree completely!!! These reviews have stated that this film is "brilliant", a "masterpiece", "incredible", however to me it is incredibly boring. After watching this movie, I felt as if I had completely wasted my time and I regret putting eyes through the pain of watching this entire film. If you are a person that enjoys self-obsessed people and self distruction (which I hope is not the case), you may like this film. In short, do not but this film, unless of course you have trouble sleeping, then give this film a shot, otherwise don't!!!!!!!!!!!


More Customer Reviews